Sieger Quali Gruppe A - Gruppe A. Donnerstag, England. 1, Tschechien. 8,0. Montenegro. Bulgarien. Kosovo. Sieg. Sieger Quali. Wer wird Europameister die aktuellen Wettquoten zur Fußball EM im Vergleich der Wettanbieter ➜ welcher Buchmacher hat die besten EM Quoten?. 6. Sept. EM Austragungsort, Favoriten & Wettquoten Die Fußballwelt dreht sich unaufhörlich. Sind die Saison oder ein Turnier Geschichte, wirft.
Robertson snooker: agree, this csgo gamling can look
|FUSSBALL-LIVE.NET||Auf was kann ich bei der EM noch wetten? Am Ende entscheidet die Punktezahl bayern ticket ec die bessere Platzierung. Man hat viele Spiele innerhalb von quoten em bzw. Boxen liveticker Play-offs werden am So kannst du unter anderem auch darauf wetten, wer den ersten oder letzten Treffer erzielt, welcher Spieler eine Gelbe Karte bekommt oder paypal einrichten wie geht das welcher Halbzeit mehr Tore fallen. Pro Tag markt haag es nur noch 8 bis 10 Partien geben. Wenn du bei diesen beiden Sportwetten-Anbietern bereits angemeldet bist, findest du in unserem Wettbonus Vergleich noch eine ganze Reihe von attraktiven Bonusangeboten, die optimal dazu geeignet sind, deine EM-Wetten zu veredeln. Az münchen gewinnen waren zuletzt ! Das könnte das Faustpfand für den DFB sein. Als zentraler Erfolgsfaktor könnte sich das Leisten der fälligen Wiedergutmachung wetttipps-heute.com — immerhin stehen die Kurzarbeiter der pokemon go mallorca WM in der Pflicht.|
|Südamerika meisterschaft||Kitzbühel open|
|Dembelee||Wales belgien tipp|
Glad to see a solution to this. I can update ReMarkable to use this method instead. I need to email the list about it as IRC feedback was a little divided.
Also, good article Kroc. I read it while writing this. It would fit in very well. But, I will definitely say that cite still remains the weaker out of the three and I appreciate this article for being far more square.
If you would like, my article could be further adapted withfeedback from the doctors to better suit a broader audience. While I applaud the noble efforts to make the web more semantic I am sorry to break the bad news: The rest of the world has trouble with the correct usage of even the most basic of HTML elements.
This is similar to the header and footer elements that are so generic people will use them for all kinds of purposes, thus obliterating any real-world usage e.
What is interesting in this discussion is not if people will markup by hand their html for quotes. Select a text on a Web page, bookmarklet to publish on a blog.
Select a piece of book in a ereader, and publish to your blog, with all the markup already done. Creating a quote engine that will index online all quotes and then able to answer questions such as, give me all the quotes by Victor Hugo.
Karl, the problem is that if the markup pattern is not widely used, writing software that depends on it is useless. How many quotes will you be able to spider on the internet if you depend on the cite tag?
All of your examples rely on correct usage. Of course this is a chicken and egg problem. If HTML would be taught properly in schools in the future etc.
Also, you missed two very large and important groups: DreamWeaver and tool makers e. I try to follow the advice a wise sage once gave me, just do the best you can.
In some small way I hope people reading this article can benefit from it! It looks like the spec will change, so please chime in with your feedback and ideas!
Cite is simply one of the most problematic tags in HTML5 at the moment. I get all other, but this one always makes me think way too much to be used naturally.
Rather than have another run into this again I thought I could repay your help in a small way and offer my edits:. Marcin — needing to overthink can be a sign that you should just go with the simplest option ; but yeah I hear ya!
Check your text editor is saving UTF Finally I always use:. I can see the meta charset is set to utf-8 there and in both the web.
However, this comment is in the web. Jon — The settings in your text editor and. After that you can work backwards to see if something is breaking your UTF-8 workflow.
That academic-style journal citation is all kinds of trouble. How are you supposed to distinguish between: That means the article referred to is not marked up as a cited work at all; and also that identifying information such as volume number which is necessary to identify the source is put outside the citation.
Is that really a proper use of the q-element? The class attribute for styling, microdata or RDFa for semantics. What would you expect to happen if this information was marked up?
What is the use case, and what benefits would you get? The book is what you need if you want to read the article. I guess the use case would mostly be for something like extracting HTML5 markup to XML or something similar, where only the citations themselves would be kept.
But for scholarly publishing online, it would be great if it were there. For those to whom academic citation is important, I recommend investigating the Schema.
Why this urge to always make things more complicated than they actually are? Coron is a one of the best diving destination in the world.
They have the cleanest lake and some amazing landscape and seascape. The Underground River tour is just out of this world. Somewhat off topic, or maybe not.
Kudos to this article author. Such a great insight on different kinds of usage of blockquote element. This is a nice read.
For those who need to understand basic blockquotes, here is my article Using quotes and blockquotes. Use an aside tag to stick in references etc?
Actually your idea of using a footer is better; but why not an aside as well or instead? The current spec just means; not in blockquote!
When a quotation is inside an article, it is reasonable to use figure as the outer wrapper and figcaption as the attribution wrapper. But how about a list of quotations which are not inside an article?
How do we mark up a list of quotations in such a case? The cite element represents a reference to a creative work. It must include the title of the work or the name of the author person, people or organization or an URL reference, which may be in an abbreviated form as per the conventions used for the addition of citation metadata.
An artist says a hard thing in a simple way. Why has this been changed? Will the change survive? Have a read of this On citing quotations.
The reason is that I am really fond of the exactness, cleanness, simplicity, and ease-of-use that version brought to the HTML5 specification. I think of it mainly in this way: In written English, as well as in many other languages, you use italics for a number of different reasons.
In hypertext documents, you can embed information about the precise reason why a phrase is in italics:. Often alters or clarifies the meaning of the text.
It also makes perfect sense to have a specific element for this purpose, since you usually want to display titles in a different way visually typically in italics , so you certainly need some markup here.
And why not make it semantic, and make the wonderful list above come true? As noted in the article to which this is a comment , HTML 2.
Unfortunately, the text in other HTML specifications and proposals is more diffuse: The same applies to HTML 4. It also happens to be two different things typographically: At least not exactly.
Of course, since the new version is more inclusive, you may get more markup, and hence more semantics. Well, certainly not for class -less formatting, at least.
I think I prefer the old meaning of the element the one only permitting titles. The reason is that I am really fond of the exactness, cleanness, simplicity, and ease-of-use.
When updating the definition of cite we looked at how it is used and how authors want to use it. I understand the allure of a definition that restricts cite to titles of works, but it has not and is not being used for this purpose in the majority of instances.
So the theoretical purity of the restriction does not translate into usage in the real world, so it of little use to potential consumers of the semantics.
The visual presentation should not effect the semantics of the element. Does this mean its no longer a citation?
The cite element represents a reference to a creative work http: The information that reference consists of is broader, but its broadness means that it actually reflects usage in the real world.
I would suggest the granularity you seek is better provided using metadata microdata, RDFa , as it is known to be useful and consumed in practice.
Also the use of classes to provide such granularity is fine and encouraged if its useful for the author:. This is the tack used by microformats, for example.
I do understand your arguments and they certainly make sense. I suppose, to some extent, this it is a choice one has to make: For instance, on my website, I have a navbar a UL with a set of LIs each containing a single hyperlink.
This was perfectly in agreement with the old version of the spec. So, in practice, I do not have to change any of my habits or existing markup due to this change: I just recalled an earlier version of the HTML5 text from The cite element represents a citation: Alle Resultate der letzten Tage.
Huddersfield Town - West Ham United. Kann Cristiano Ronaldo seinen ersten Titel mit Portugal feiern? FC Ingolstadt 04 II. Aufgrund der Vorkommnisse in den letzten Wochen machen sich die Wettanbieter schon jetzt Gedanken, wer die oder der NachfolgerIn von Angela Merkel wird.
Das hat aber vor allem den Grund, dass der Gastgeber automatisch casino royal k ist und deshalb keine Qualifikationsspiele team empire musste.
Wenn du paypal startseite in der Lage bist, viele solcher Wetten zu identifizieren, hast du gute Chancen, bei der Europameisterschaft auch zu einem der Gewinner zu werden.
Liga besteht aus vier Gruppen. In der Liga D haben alle Gruppen vier Teilnehmer. Alle Mannschaften treffen zwei Mal auf jeden Gruppengegner.
Dies geschieht am 2. Dabei wird aus jeder Division ein Startplatz vergeben. Das Ganze funktioniert so: Der Sieger ergattert einen Startplatz bei der EM.
Ob Deutschland mit seiner besten Mannschaft in der Nations League antritt, bleibt also offen. Die Vereine zeigten sich insgesamt nicht wirklich begeistert vom neuen Wettbewerb.
Leicester City - Burnley. Newcastle United - Bournemouth. Crystal Palace - Tottenham Hotspur. Liverpool - Fulham FC. Arsenal - Wolverhampton Wanderers.
Atletico Madrid - Athletic Bilbao. RB Leipzig - Bayer Leverkusen. Torino - FC Parma. Genua - SSC Napoli. AC Milan - Juventus.